<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NZRFC &#187; SNA1 IPP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recfish.co.nz/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=sna1-ipp" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recfish.co.nz</link>
	<description>Access to Abundant Fisheries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 01:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Snapper1 Initial Position Paper (IPP)</title>
		<link>http://www.recfish.co.nz/?p=1383&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=snapper1-initial-position-paper-ipp</link>
		<comments>http://www.recfish.co.nz/?p=1383#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNA1 IPP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recfish.co.nz/?p=1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) has released an initial position paper for the management of Snapper in area 1 (Northland, Auckland, Bay of Plenty). The proposal has several possible options, including drastic cuts to recreational bag limits, or leaving recreational [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) has released an initial position paper for the management of Snapper in area 1 (Northland, Auckland, Bay of Plenty).<br />
The proposal has several possible options, including drastic cuts to recreational bag limits, or leaving recreational limits alone and increasing commercial catch.</p>
<p>All options presented are fundamentally flawed.</p>
<p>The most logical option is not even presented, because it does not meet political objectives of increasing commercial catch limits.<br />
The logical option is to increase the tonnage allocated to recreational fishers, in line with catch, and to leave commercial catch limits as they are.</p>
<p>Read the <a href='http://www.recfish.co.nz/?attachment_id=1384' rel='attachment wp-att-1384'>Stakeholder Letter-2013</a> and the <a href='http://www.recfish.co.nz/?attachment_id=1385' rel='attachment wp-att-1385'>2013-31-IPP-Review-management-snapper1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recfish.co.nz/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1383</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
